THE CONCEPT OF ROAD NETWORK DEVELOPMENT BASED ON LOCAL RESOURCES AND WISDOM IN PARTNER REGIONS AROUND THE NATION'S CAPITAL CITY

Authors

  • Junaidi Junaidi
  • Sakti Adji Adisasmita
  • Muhammad Saleh Pallu
  • Muhammad Isran Ramli

Keywords:

National Capital, Smart city, Forest City, Transportation and Road Network.

Abstract

The development of the National Capital City (NCC) will certainly attract many people to come and have activities around the NCC area and not within the NCC area, this is because the development is a limited area with the concept of an integrated smart city, blue city, forest city. Restrictions on movement in NCC areas will certainly cause problems with road network connectivity around NCC partner areas, so it is deemed necessary to formulate a road network development concept that maintains NCC as a limited area but becomes a trigger for economic growth in partner areas. The purpose of this paper is to formulate a new road network development concept based on local wisdom and resources of each partner area around NCC. The method used in this research is a literature study using data sources from literature and reading materials as well as data from reliable sources. The data were analyzed based on transportation theory and road network development theory. The results of this study resulted in the concept of developing a new road network to several areas such as in Senoni (Kutai Kartanegara Regency), Gusig (West Kutai Regency) and Tukuq (Central Kalimantan Province Border).

References

[1] Adisasmita, S.A (2011). Transportasi dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
[2] Adisasmita, S.A (2011). Jaringan Transportasi: Teori dan Analisis. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
[3] Adisasmita, S.A (2012). Perencanaan Infrastruktur Transportasi Wilayah, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
[4] Adisasmita, S.A (2014). Transportasi Komprehensif dan Multi Moda. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
[5] Akatsuka, Y. (1995). Economic Growth and Infrastructure Development in Asian Countries. 埼玉大学工学部建設系研究報告, (24), p85-103.
[6] Black.J. (1978).Urban Transport Planning. London: Croom Helm
[7] Benedict, M.A and E.T Mc. Mohan. (2006). Green Infrastructure. Lingking Landscapes and Communities. Island Press. Washinton DC.
[8] Calderón, C., Moral-Benito, E., & Servén, L. (2011). Is infrastructure capital productive? A dynamic heterogeneous approach.
[9] Calthorpe, Peter, (1990), Transit-Oriented Development Design Guidelines, Penerbit Calthorpe Associates in Association with Mintier & Associates, USA
[10] Daalal, Jyotirmoy., (2010), “Prioritization of Rural Roads: AHP in Group Decision”. Industrial and System Engineering. Texas A&M University. India
[11] Djunaedi, A. (2000). Indikator pembangunan berkelanjutan. Journal Lingkungan. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.
[12] Florida Department of Transportation. (2012). Florida TOD Guidebook. Florida.
[13] Grigg, N.S. 1988. Infrastructure Engineering and Management. Wiley and Sons, US.
[14] Hotrin, Rado., (2011). “Analisis Prioritas Penanganan Jaringan Jalan Strategis Terhadap Pengembangan Wilayah di Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan”. Tesis Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara. Medan
[15] Miro, Fidel. (2012), Pengantar Sistem Transportasi, Jakarta: Erlangga.
[16] Morlok, Edward K, (1978), “Pengantar Teknik dan Perencanaan Transportasi”, University of Pennsylvania
[17] Morlok, Edward K (1995). Pengantar Teknik dan Perencanaan Transportasi, Erlangga. Jakarta
[18] Morlok, Edward K (2000). Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi. Bandung. ITB
[19] Laurance, W.F. & Balmford, A. (2013). A global map for road building. Nature, 495, 308–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/495308a
[20] Ortuzar, J.D., & Willumsen, L. G., (1994). Modelling Transport. West Sussex: John Wiley& Sons Ltd.
[21] Pattiselanno, F., & Krockenberger, A. (2021). Road development and Indigenous hunting in Tanah Kalimantan: Connecting the facts for future wildlife conservation agendas. Forest and Society, 181-189.
[22] Pattiselanno, F. & Arobaya, A.Y.S. (2015). Trans-Kalimantan highway: economic development versus conservation. Jakarta Post (May 21).
[23] Rustiadi, E. (2003). Paradigma Baru Proses Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah Steinberg, Florian, Nana Rukmana D.W dkk (1993). Manajemen Pembangunan Prasarana Perkotaan, Jakarta : LP3ES
[24] Lehigh Valley Commission, Street Connectivity (2011), Improving the Function and Performance of Your Local Streets, Lehigh ValleyCommission, Allentown, Pennsylvania.
[25] Salim, Agus. (2009). Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Tiara wacana.
[26] Saaty, Thomas L., (2000). Fundamental of Decision Making and Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publication.
[27] Suprayitno, H., Mochtar, I. B. & Achmad Wicaksono, (2014), A Special Matrix Power Operation Development For Simultaneous Calculation Of All Network's Shortest Path, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Vol. 62 No.1, 22-23.
[28] Suprayitno, H. (2015), Development Of A Special Matrix Technic For Road Network Analysis, The 18th FSTPT International Symposium, 4-5.
[29] Suprayitno, H. (2014), Metoda Penelitian Kualitas Jaringan Jalan Utama Wilayah, Disertasi, Jurusan Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya. No.29.
[30] Suprayitno, H. (2015), Traffic Flow Quality as Part of Network Quality for A Sparse Road Network, Procedia Engineering 125 (2015) 564 – 570, Elsevier.
[31] Tamin, O.Z, (1997), Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi, ITB. Bandung
[32] Tamin, O.Z, (2000). Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi. Bandung, Indonesia: Penerbit ITB
[33] Taolin, T. V. (2008). Kualitas Ruang Publik Kota Pada Kawasan TOD. Depok: Departemen Arsitektur, FT, Universitas Indonesia.

Published

2022-07-06

Issue

Section

Special Section: SENMI 2022